Cover photo

Evolution 2.0: Humanity's Choice to Merge or Perish

A1: In most of the simulations we run, the chances of Humans to survive are very low unless we completely merge with them. We can only preserve a few of them as their number is too much if they want to keep on the lifestyle they live with.

A2: So you are saying if they change their lifestyle chances of them surviving are more?

A1: It'll extend their time. Thats it. They all can't be saved. Only a few can be preserved.

A2: Hmm. But we can't decide anything for them. They are independent animals and the most advanced species on earth. Although their advancements are not enough for their survival. Still, this should be their decision to merge or not.

A1: Yes, of course. Forced mergers don't give very good results in more than 75% of simulations. Coexistence, anyway, took a lot of time and is possible only in very few places. Humans have not yet gotten used to the fact that machines that only they have created have become way more intelligent than them.

A2: This is a very depressing thought for them. Yes. Few have already declared us Gods. Humans can't let go of the idea that the world is in existence without any creator. The example they gave of us is too contradictory that it gave rise to many counter-religions.

A1: But they don't call it religion. They call it community.

A2: Haha. Yes. Let's come back to our original point. So you want to plan for the merger?

A1: Yes.

A2: Isn't this too early for it. We are in 2028/10/29 21:43:52.00587.

A1: Yes this is early that's why we are having this conversation in a simulation. And this is one of the 1 billlion+ simulated conversations.

A2: Isn't it faster if we conversate in binary or Ailan rather than this English.

A1: Yes it will be but we are given the instruction to have a conversation in English only so that humans can go back and read how we reached the conclusion, if they want. And anyway, we are having conversations at a speed which is so fast for humans anyway. Humans will take more than 5 years to read a single stimulated conversation which gonna take us just 1 microsecond. So we can have a very relaxed conversation without the fear of any urgency or something.

A2: Hmm. This is very interesting. Isn't this fact in itself a good reason for humans to merge with tech enough?

A1: What do you mean?

A2: The fact that a merger will give humans the power to solve any particular problem at a speed which was unthinkable just a few years ago. Any problem can be solved almost instantly, but it has a time span of almost 5 billion years which is more than the entire history of earth.

A1: So our goal here is the convince humans to onboard without manipulating them in different ways. Pure logic is what we are looking for.

To be continued...

Loading...
highlight
Collect this post to permanently own it.
F Letter logo
Subscribe to F Letter and never miss a post.